My Hero: Mark Mendel
Gambling Dispute With a Tiny Country Puts U.S. in a Bind tells the fascinating David-and-Goliath story of the WTO battle between Antigua and Barbuda, on the one hand, and the US, on the other.
Mendel has threatened US online gambling legislation, intellectual property law, and the WTO's fragile existence, all in one fell swoop. Amazing!
(Thanks to Jason Ditz for the link)
Update: Antigua Seriously Pushing For WTO Approval To Distribute Free Music And Movies
Long-short: Jay Cohen, an operator of an offshore sports betting operation in Antigua who had been sentenced to 21 months in prison for taking bets over the Internet from Americans, was a friend of a law partner of Mendel. Mendel looked into the matter to see if there was anything his firm could do. He ended up persuading "officials in Antigua and Barbuda, a tiny nation in the Caribbean with a population of around 70,000, to instigate a trade complaint [in 2003] against the United States, claiming its ban against Americans gambling over the Internet violated Antigua and Barbuda’s rights as a member of the W.T.O. ... [T]he dozens of online casinos based there are vital to the island’s economy, serving as its second-largest employer. "
A W.T.O. panel actually ruled against the United States in 2004, and its appellate body upheld that decision one year later. And "in March, the organization upheld that ruling for a second time and declared Washington out of compliance with its rules."
So the US is in a quandary: "Complying with the W.T.O. ruling ... would require Congress and the Bush administration either to reverse course and permit Americans to place bets online legally with offshore casinos or, equally unlikely, impose an across-the-board ban on all forms of Internet gambling -- including the online purchase of lottery tickets, participation in Web-based pro sports fantasy leagues and off-track wagering on horse racing."
And what damages does the US owe? Well, Mendel is claiming $3.4 billion in damages on behalf of Antigua. If the US refuses to pay, then what can Antigua do? Normally, "a country that wins a W.T.O. case typically demands trade penalties equal to its losses as compensation. But Antigua is so small that any ordinary trade sanctions would barely register in the United States." Therefore, "To get around that limitation, Antigua is seeking the right under international law to violate American intellectual property laws. ... Mendel, who is claiming $3.4 billion in damages on behalf of Antigua, has asked the trade organization to grant a rare form of compensation if the American government refuses to accept the ruling: permission for Antiguans to violate intellectual property laws by allowing them to distribute copies of American music, movie and software products, among others."
"For the W.T.O. itself, the decision is equally fraught with peril. It cannot back down because that would undermine its credibility with the rest of the world. But if it actually carries out the penalties, it risks a political backlash in the United States, the most powerful force for free-flowing global trade and the W.T.O.'s biggest backer.
"Think of this from the W.T.O.'s point of view," said Charles R. Nesson, a professor at Harvard Law School. "They're this fledgling organization dominated by a huge monster in the United States. People there must be scared out of their wits at the prospects of enforcing
a ruling that would instantly galvanize public opinion in the United States against the W.T.O.""


Comments (7)
Would such a ruling really "galvanize public opinion in the United States against the WTO?" I suppose intellectual property interests such as Hollywood and the software industry could pay for an anti-WTO PR campaign, but many Internet-savvy Americans don't really give one whit about IP and an even larger number would be angry if online gambling was completely taken away from them. The only people whom I think would care would be politicians and nationalists who can't stand to see America's name tarnished by anyone.
Published: August 23, 2007 3:47 PM
I'm trying to decide if this good/bad, or merely bad/good.
If the WTO wins, the US gov't, or at least the individuals running things in the affected department, gets egg on its face for messing in the Internet/the affairs of other nations. BUT, the WTO then has established additional precedent for real primary jurisdiction over the US. Not so good.
If the US wins, the WTO's fragile existence and legitimacy are threatened, true. BUT, this also reemboldens the US to go rule cyberspace, and morality in general, among the uncivilized savages who live over there in forn parts.
Don't go counting your wins before they're lost. Beware the blowbackwock, my son. No offense, Steven, but only the lawyers are going to win this thing, no matter what the outcome.
Published: August 23, 2007 3:56 PM
I am in love!
Published: August 23, 2007 3:56 PM
Ack! Stephan, not Steven. Sorry! You'd think I'd learn to spehl proberly aftur awl dese yeers.
And Ian, that's sort of my thinking on that issue too, except I think that to the extent that your standard American would hear about this at all, they'll likely side with the WTO anyway. Not so much galvanizing as just plain old oxidizing interest in the US govt as a whole, these days. While faith in OUR government has been shaken, I doubt seriously that faith in GOVERNMENT in general has been stirred much.
Published: August 23, 2007 4:00 PM
"Think of this from the W.T.O.'s point of view," said Charles R. Nesson, a professor at Harvard Law School. "They're this fledgling organization dominated by a huge monster in the United States. People there must be scared out of their wits at the prospects of enforcing
a ruling that would instantly galvanize public opinion in the United States against the W.T.O.""
Maybe this wouldn't galvanize the population against the WTO The online file sharing community (The Pirate Bay in particular) has been looking to set up servers that would be free from International Law. I am sure that a large majority of young people would greatly appreciate being able to download without fear of the state. However those that take part in filesharing are not the ones that get politicians care to pounder to.
Published: August 23, 2007 4:30 PM
肺癌
Published: August 24, 2007 1:45 AM
Hey I wonder how long before the Bush administration "discovers" Antigua's links to Al Queda and secret stores of Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction?
Published: March 21, 2008 8:33 AM