Comments (8)

• Bill

  This is all Walmarts fault. If you give an inch the unions and progressives will attempt to take a mile.

  If Walmart was worried about putting customers in stores like its founder they would not have these stupid problems. But they made a stupid choice and decided to work with the statist scum. Now they pay.

  You wonder why union membership is declining.
  

  Published: March 22, 2007 11:52 AM

• Person

  Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't Wal-mart be hardest hit by a port nuclear attack? Since that would kill their supply chains and cause their stores to be looted?

  Published: March 22, 2007 11:59 AM

• Person

  I mean, other than the dead people and all.
  
  I'm just saying, if you're claiming they're skimping on port nuclear safety to ... *increase* profits ... you kinda have to wonder.

  Published: March 22, 2007 12:55 PM

• Brent

  I agree with Person -- you really have to lack the ability to start with the assumption that mega-successful Wal-Mart doesn't care about the safety of ports. It is like saying they don't care about the safety of their trucking (which I believe is said by truckers who don't like Wal-Mart's demanding schedules for loading and stocking stores).

  Furthermore, Wal-Mart has a lot of incentive to productively prevent terrorism, too... so the whole ad is silly rhetoric. But Bill is right, too, in saying that Wal-Mart's CEO has been flirting with the political scum... once you play in the dirt, you no longer have clean hands.

  Published: March 22, 2007 3:55 PM

• Brent

  lack the ability *to think*

  Published: March 22, 2007 3:55 PM

• QWQW

  WQQW

  Illiegal Immigrants Require 6 Arrests to Warrant Federal Prosecution in Texas, Memo Says CC

  Published: March 23, 2007 1:00 AM

• Alan Dunn

  What is the difference between a union and a business? They both provide a good/service and they each act to achieve goals.

  That union membership is falling could be to do with the changing nature of work rather than any inherent mistrust of unions; or that governments have changed the rules / state of play in favour of one group at the expense of another.

  Compulsory unionism though is another matter and I don't think it is right for people to be forced into membership. Alternatively businesses getting favours from governments is a pet peeve of mine as well.

  no workable solution from me then :0)

  cheers
  

  Published: March 23, 2007 5:40 AM

• Windows Hosting

  thanks good site and webmaster

  Published: March 28, 2007 5:46 PM