1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Mises Economics Blog

That anniversary

March 20, 2007 8:36 AM by Jeffrey Tucker (Archive)

I find Iraq news painful to read so I was glad for this summary of the current situation in Iraq, from Antiwar.com, but can you believe that author's claim that "cuts to state subsidies" for industry contributes to inflation? Oh well, it still contains good information.

Nowhere on Earth is there a worse refugee crisis than in Iraq today. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, some 2 million Iraqis have fled their country and are now scattered from Jordan, Syria, Turkey, and Iran to London and Paris. (Almost none have made it to the United States, which has done nothing to address the refugee crisis it created.) Another 1.9 million are estimated to be internally displaced persons, driven from their homes and neighborhoods by the U.S. occupation and the vicious civil war it has sparked. Add those figures up – and they're getting worse by the day – and you have close to 16 percent of the Iraqi population uprooted. Add the dead to the displaced, and that figure rises to nearly one in five Iraqis. Let that sink in for a moment.

Basic foods and necessities, which even Saddam Hussein's brutal regime managed to provide, are now increasingly beyond the reach of ordinary Iraqis, thanks to soaring inflation unleashed by the occupation's destruction of the already shaky Iraqi economy, cuts to state subsidies encouraged by the International Monetary Fund and the Coalition Provisional Authority, and the disruption of the oil industry. Prices of vegetables, eggs, tea, cooking and heating oil, gasoline, and electricity have skyrocketed. Unemployment is regularly estimated at somewhere between 50-70 percent. One measure of the impact of all this has been a significant rise in child malnutrition, registered by the United Nations and other organizations. Not surprisingly, access to safe water and regular electricity remain well below pre-invasion levels, which were already disastrous after more than a decade of comprehensive sanctions against, and periodic bombing of, a country staggered by a catastrophic war with Iran in the 1980s and the First Gulf War.

In an ongoing crisis, in which hundred of thousands of Iraqis have already died, the last few months have proved some of the bloodiest on record. In October alone, more than 6,000 civilians were killed in Iraq, most in Baghdad, where thousands of additional U.S. troops had been sent in August (in the first official Bush administration "surge") with the claim that they would restore order and stability in the city. In the end, they only fueled more violence. These figures – and they are generally considered undercounts – are more than double the 2005 rate. Other things have more or less doubled in the last years, including, to name just two, the number of daily attacks on U.S. troops and the overall number of U.S. soldiers killed and wounded. United Nations special investigator Manfred Nowak also notes that torture "is totally out of hand" in Iraq. "The situation is so bad many people say it is worse than it has been in the times of Saddam Hussein."

Bookmark/Share | Comments (2)

Comments (2)

  • Niels van der Linden

    The United States government have succesfully turned the country of Iraq into a wasteland. If that means 'mission accomplished', then we finally know what the mission was.

    How can anyone think that the United States is a 'free' country and that democracy means freedom, if such a product (the mission) can come from the United States?

    Published: March 20, 2007 9:25 AM

  • RogerM

    "There is a general agreement across much of the political spectrum that we can blame Iraqis for the problems they face."

    There's a lot of truth in the the accusations against Iraqis. Anyone who knows the Arab world knows that the culture is one of corruption, abuse of power and violence. Algeria is a good example. It has experience similar Muslim on Muslim violence for over ten years and the US had nothing to do with it.

    The US succeeded in overthrowing Hussein and establishing a democratic government. We should have pulled our troops out with the last election. Instead, we have decided we need to change the Arab culture in Iraq and eliminate corruption and violence. That's a fool's errand!

    Most of the violence in Iraq is Shia against Sunni, Sunni against Shia, which we didn't start. Al Qaeda started it as a deliberate strategy to start a civil war and tie down US troops. It was only natural self-defense for the Shia to fight back. Blaming the US for this religious violence is just plain silly. Such violence didn't exist under Hussein because he was Sunni and used Sunnis to murder Shia who opposed him.

    The violence seems strange to Americans who don't understand Arab culture and believe that Iraqis are just darker skinned Americans who speak another language. But Iraqis, and Arabs in general, have a very different code of ethics from ours. They are much more concerned about their honor and are willing to kill to maintain it. For example, if someone from another tribe kills someone in my tribe, honor demands that I kill someone in the offending tribe. The victim can be anyone as long they're a member of the other tribe. There's no effort to find and kill the offending party. As a result, tribal feuds can last for centuries. That mentality explains why Sunnis and Shia will murder innocent civilians in markets and mosques out of revenge, which is the only way to restore honor in the Arab mind.

    If the US pulled out tomorrow, Sunnis and Shia would continue to murder each other as they have in Algeria for over ten years. The Iraqi government will continue to be corrupt and abuse its power. But that simply describes every other Arab country in the world. It's the Arab way.

    Published: March 20, 2007 10:44 AM

Post an intelligent and civil comment

(Please allow up to one minute for your comment to be processed.)