1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Mises Economics Blog

Federal Excess

January 4, 2006 5:56 AM by Karen De Coster (Archive)

Jim Cook has an outstanding column that posted today, wherein he notes Mises and Drucker:

Financing Excess

A lot has been written recently about the late Peter Drucker, who passed away in November. For many years Mr. Drucker was the preeminent authority on business management. He wrote 35 books, including his groundbreaking Practice of Management, and The Effective Executive. He spent several years at General Motors and his 1945 book about GM, Concept of the Corporation, introduced the idea of decentralization and launched both the field of management and business consulting.

Late in his career he became disillusioned with the high wages some business executives were getting. He said, "although I believe in the free market, I have serious reservations about capitalism." Far be it from me to correct this management luminary, but unless we understand the true cause of excess we will stand idly by while our institutions are undermined.

When the Central Bank provides a glut of money and credit, it unleashes a torrent of speculation. When financial engineering is easily financed, then the game becomes one of mergers and acquisitions in place of new investment and production. Credit and leverage allow for excessive compensation earned from wheeling and dealing. Easy money boosts the price of stocks. The inflation of money and credit finances stock buybacks and newly popular stock options that enable outsized rewards for executives and managers.

The more money people make, the more they want. The easy money provokes greed and short-term thinking. Inflation is the government’s primary tool for its ill-advised management of the economy. It also lays the groundwork for many things that go haywire in our society. It is not the fault of capitalism and the free market that abuses in executive compensation occurs. It is the fault of the government and the Central Bank.

It’s going to get crazier, wilder and looser. That’s because inflating requires more and more inflating. According to Ludwig von Mises, "Because an inflationary policy works only as long as the yearly increments in the amount of money in circulation are increased more and more, the rise in prices and wages and the corresponding drop in purchasing power will go on at an accelerated pace."

All the paper money that ever existed in the world, prior to what we use now, inevitably became worthless. Hundreds of paper currencies in scores of countries wound up in the wastebasket. As Voltaire once noted, "Paper money always returns to its intrinsic value – zero." One of the definitions of money is that it’s a store of value. That’s not the case with our dollar. It continues to lose value. Who can make a convincing case that it won’t wind up like other worthless paper currencies? In their book, The Coming Collapse of the Dollar, James Turk and John Rubino point out, "Whether ancient or modern, monarchy or republic, coin or paper, each nation descends pretty much the same slippery slope, expanding government to address perceived needs, accumulating too much debt, and then repudiating its obligations by destroying its currency."


Bookmark/Share | Comments (4)

Comments (4)

  • David J. Heinrich

    "All the paper money that ever existed in the world, prior to what we use now, inevitably became worthless."

    This seems like a tautology. Obviously, all of the paper money prior to what we use now is worthless (or near-worthless, except for collectible value). Perhaps a more meaningful statement would be to say that anyone having held paper currency from (say 200 years ago) would find it worthless today (and close to worthless, a penny on the dollar, from a 100 years ago); while the person holding gold would find it to have maintained its purchasing power.

    Published: January 4, 2006 8:07 AM

  • SteamshipTime

    Other than the ability to inflate and not experience a "run" (provided the rate of inflation is not too unpredictable), I'm not sure how the US Treasury differs from the clearing house that a barter club would utilize for its members' claims against other members' goods and services. My father tells me that as a boy in the 1950's, he recalled people who had been predicting a crack-up boom for the past 30 to 40 years. I note also that neither Nazi Germany nor Argentina resorted to the gold standard to solve their countries' currency crises. I don't deny that the most recent fling with fiat currency may yet be in its early stages.

    In addition to the corrosive effects of monetary inflation, I recall reading a single line by somebody that the populist "antitrust" legislation is to blame in no small part for the rise of the modern publicly traded company as a vehicle of private corruption. Perhaps one of the Institute's academics could explore this in depth.

    Published: January 4, 2006 8:47 PM

  • Ohhh Henry

    I think that the Nazi's "solved" their country's currency crisis by ... ta da! ... more inflation. To spread the newly inflated Reichsmarks around they gave everyone make-work jobs in the army and building tanks and autobahns, stole their wages through forced savings programs on which they reneged (making deductions from their salaries with the promise of a shiny new "Folks Wagon"), quelled inflationary unrest by using the army and police to enforce wage and price controls, confiscated the savings of its most prosperous citizens, then started a war with the citizens of four continents to plunder their treasuries and get access to cheap labor, then killed tens of millions of people when it became impossible to feed them and to use them for productive work.

    Simple! And all without the need to use anything fancy and complicated like a gold standard.

    Published: January 5, 2006 8:55 PM

  • SteamshipTime

    O H,

    That's a very compressed version of events. Also, are you sure that the Nazi government inflated the money supply? I tend to think it would be more along the lines of some currency redemption/re-valuation scheme, but I simply don't know what they did.

    The unfortunate point remains, a currency crisis will not necessarily force a return to the gold standard much as we'd like to believe otherwise.

    Published: January 6, 2006 9:03 AM

Post an intelligent and civil comment

(Please allow up to one minute for your comment to be processed.)