Thinking of Grad School?
Here is the latest edition of my memo on economics in graduate school. Thanks for the input from those who have helped me on this project.
Entire text below, without active links. Best approach is to print the PDF.
Dear Colleagues:
We owe it to our students to give them the most full and accurate information we have about phd programs. Don’t get angry with me if I’ve been unjust to your school, or ignored it altogether. My info is only as good as what I’ve been given; please correct any errors and omissions in what appears below. I’m limiting this to phd programs! If I am skimpy in my description of yours, it is not because I am purposefully denigrating you. It is due to the fact that I have not yet been corrected by you. Please help me make this the best list of this sort it can be.
After I put together a final draft, I would ask that you use what parts of this that make sense to you, and ignore the rest. I hope and trust it will do some good, because we want our undergrads to make good grad school choices. I think this effort of mine has started some libertarian philosophers into doing for that field what we are doing for this one, which is great. Certainly, libertarian historians, political scientists, sociologists, etc., should all be encouraged to replicate our efforts.
Best regards,
Walter
---------
Dear Students:
As you know, the best description of my own views is that of Austrian economics, libertarian political philosophy. Hence my focus in this direction. Virtually all Austrian economists are also libertarians in political philosophy, while the opposite does not at all hold true. That is, most free market economists are neoclassicals, public choicers, supply siders, etc., but not Austrians.
Here are my recommendations re grad schools. I have three separate lists.
In A, you can get a phd in economics, and Austrian economics is part of the official program.
In B you can get a phd in economics, and Austrian economics is not part of the official program (but there are Austrians and/or libertarians on the faculty).
In C, you can not get a phd in economics, and Austrian economics is not part of the official program, but there are Austrian economists on the faculty, and you can get a phd in some other, related, subject.
I rank the schools within each category in alphabetical order.
In A, you can get a phd in economics, and Austrian economics is part of the official program.
A1. Aix-en-Provence, France
Aix offers a Phd Program where Austrian economics is considered as a primary field of interest. The Program is provided by the 'Centre d'analyse économique", which is a department of the "Faculté d'Economie Appliquée" (University Aix-Marseille III). The actual director of the department is Pierre Garello who has studied at the Austrian department of NYU. Like Pierre Garello, the majority of the professors and lecturers on the faculty are Austrian economists, or at least oriented toward classical liberalism. For example: Jean-Pierre Centi, Gérard Bramoullé, Elisabeth Krecké, Hervé Magnouloux, Philippe Maitre, Thierry Sebagh, Dominique Augey.
Their specific fields of interest include epistemology, monetary economics, law-and-economics, public choice, entrepreneurship. The department regularly invites foreign visiting professors working within the tradition of Austrian economics, such as Mario Rizzo or Bruce Caldwell. Regularly, seminars are organized, where PHD students or faculty have the opportunity to present their research and discuss the first draft of their papers.
A masters degree in economics is a prerequisite to enter the PHD program. Admission depends on acceptance of the candidate by the director of the Program.
Contact person: mailto:elisabeth_krecke@yahoo.fr
A2. ESEADE, Argentina
ESEADE (Superior School of Economics and Business Management) is a 25 year old Graduate School of Business located in Buenos Aires, Argentina. In 2003 it started a Ph.D. program in Economics, one in Management, and one in Economic and Social History. These programs place the main emphasis on the dissertation. Director of the PhD. in Economics is Juan Carlos Cachanosky, who got his own PhD with the eminent Austrian, Hans Sennholz. Foreign tutors are all Austrian/libertarian (see “Doctorados at www.eseade.edu.ar.) They are: Walter Block; Lawrence H. White; Peter G. Klein; Peter Boettke; Michael Wohlgemuth; Carlos Rodriguez Braun; Jesús Huerta de Soto; Jerry Ellig; George Selgin; Jan Narveson; Richard M. Ebeling; Peter Lewin; Nicolai Paul
Foss; Richard N. Langlois; Wolfgang Grassl. Contact: Martin Krause [martin@eseade.edu.ar]
A3. Universidad Francisco Marroquin, Guatemala.
The following comes to me courtesy of Giancarlo Ibarguen, President, Universidad Francisco Marroquín:
Universidad Francisco Marroquín (UFM) in Guatemala, under its School of Economic Sciences, offers both a master and PhD program in economics based on the principles of the Austrian School of Economics. UFM’s doctoral program (carried out in English) follows the European model of dissertation and defense. A masters degree in economics is recommended though not requisite, with admission based on the successful completion of a series of exams in macroeconomics, microeconomics and history of economic thought.
Juan Carlos Cachanosky, academic director of both programs, took his PhD under Austrian economist Hans Sennholz. The roster of dissertation advisors is an international who’s who of classical liberal scholars, many of whom are either Austrian or strong sympathizers in their economic focus: Donald Boudreaux (chairman of economics, George Mason University), George Selgin (professor of economics, University of Georgia), Lawrence White (F.A. Hayek professor of economic history, University of Missouri at St. Louis), Robert Higgs (senior fellow in political economy, The Independent Institute), Stephen Davies (professor of history, Manchester Metropolitan University), Joseph Keckeissen (professor of economics, UFM), Pierre Garello (professor of economics, Université Aix-Marseille), Peter Boettke (Senior Fellow, Mercatus Center; professor of economics, George Mason University), and Roger Garrison (professor of economics, Auburn University). Contact: Wenceslao Giménez-Bonet, dean, School of Economic Sciences at UFM: wgbonet@ufm.edu.gt
A4. George Mason
There are quite a few Austrian economists on the faculty: Peter Boettke, Don Boudreaux, Karen Vaughn (who is retiring soon), Richard Wagner, Jack High (Public Policy Dept.), Tyler Cowen, Vernon Smith, Alex Tabbarok. In addition, James Buchanan has some Austrian leanings, but mainly on subjective costs; however, he is to be credited, in large part, for the existence of the Austrian program at Mason in the first place. Bryan Caplan and Gordon Tullock are knowledgeable about Austrianism, albeit critical. Plus there are an additional, dozen or so libertarian but non Austrian profs, several in the law school; for example, Todd Zywicki, Walter Williams, James Bennett, Ron Heiner, Charles Rowley, John Hasnas, Michael Krauss and Russell Roberts. Buchanan and Smith are Nobel Prize winners in economics. Mason features formal course work in Austrian economics, and a field exam in that subject so students can specialize in Austrian economics. In my own personal view, while Mason is not typically rated as a high prestige place like the Ivies, Chicago, MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, etc., its two Nobel prize winners show it is really underrated. I expect that by the time you get your phd, Mason will move up in the prestige rankings. You should also look at the web site of the James M. Buchanan Center and the Program on Philosophy, Politics and Economics http://www.gmu.edu/jbc/ppe/index.html, and the RAE web site www.gmu.edu/rae. In addition, many of the Mason profs are members of the Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, an organization which holds its annual meetings at in conjunction with the Southern Economic Association: http://it.stlawu.edu/sdae/. Contact: "Peter Boettke" pboettke@gmu.edu mailto:pboettke@gmu.edu, and check out his website; http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/pboettke/workshop.html
A5. New York University
Mario Rizzo and David Harper are Austrian economists on the faculty. There are explicitly Austrian courses available, here. Most importantly, NYU features an informal weekly Austrian seminar attended by several New York City area Austro libertarians, in addition to these two, including Joe Salerno (Pace University), Bill Butos (Trinity College, CT), Sandy Ikeda (SUNY-Purchase, NY) Young Back Choi (St. John's Univ., NY), Roger Koppl (Fairleigh-Dickinson Univ., NJ), James Sadowsky (emeritus Fordham University, NYC), and Thomas McQuade (no academic affiliation but he received Ph.D. at Auburn under Garrison and Yeager). The official colloquium name has been changed this year from Austrian Economic Colloquium to Colloquium on Market Institutions and
Economic Processes. Another advantage of this program: there are Austrian Fellowships available at NYU. I.e. you can get a full ride and stipend because of your Austrian credentials. Israel Kirzner, the elder statesman of Austrian economics, is now retired, but it is my understanding that he still has some contact with the program. However, applicants should be aware that the NYU program is highly mathematical. The typical admitted student has: 3-4 semesters of calculus, a course in linear algebra, two semesters of mathematical statistics. Some have taken differential equations. The quantitative GRE minimum is around 770. There is no chance that a student who doesn't have this background can get through the first year. Economics here is now applied mathematics. A successful applicant will have the equivalent of a mathematics minor. NYU gets 700-1,000 applicants and accepts only 20-25. Contact: mario.rizzo@nyu.edu.
In B you can get a phd in economics, and Austrian economics is not part of the official program (but there are Austrians and/or libertarians on the faculty).
B1. University of Canterbury, New Zealand
This material comes to me from Eric Crampton:
I thought you might want to add the University of Canterbury to your list.
I'm still feeling my way around here -- I may be the only full blown libertarian on faculty, but there are a few others who are free market oriented. They're letting me teach public choice this fall and do the graduate public finance as a mix of public finance and public choice in the spring.
The school does have a PhD program, but it's a bit of an odd one -- it's entirely thesis based, and done after completion of the master's level coursework and the master's thesis. It is certainly not as strong a PhD as you'd get at most US schools, but it is a good option.
Alan Woodfield is published in Public Choice; Phil Meguire is a Chicago trained economist. Steve Tucker does experimental work, some of it exploring public choice theory. Jeremy Clark has done some experimental public choice. See: http://www.econ.canterbury.ac.nz/econ.htm. Contact person: Eric Crampton: eric.crampton@canterbury.ac.nz.
B2. University of Chicago.
There are lots of free enterprise but non Austrian professors here. Almost all Nobel Prizes awarded to free enterprise oriented economists have had some contact with Chicago, either as students or professors. Chicago is widely known as the most prestigious of all free enterprise oriented phd programs. (However, see some interesting and critical comments on this program below under the Harvard listing).
B3. Clemson
There are several free enterprisers at Clemson. Bob Tollison, Bruce Yandle (APEE), Daniel Benjamin (PERC) and Bob McCormick. http://hubcap.clemson.edu/economics/faculty/intro.htm
B4. The University of Connecticut
Steve Cunningham is pro free market, Francis Ahking is a Rational Expectations Chicago oriented economist, and Dick Langlois is a Mises/Hayek professor.
B5. Florida State, Tallahassee B6. University of Georgia, Athens. B7. Guelph University B8. Harvard University B9. University of Missouri at Columbia B10. North Carolina State. B11. Washington University, St. Louis In C, you can not get a phd in economics, and Austrian economics is not part of the official program, but there are Austrian economists on the faculty, and you can get a phd in some other, related, subject. C1. Auburn University A great advantage for Austrian students at Auburn is that the Mises Institute is located right next door. The Mises Institute is the preeminent institution for the teaching of Austrian economics and libertarian theory. They hold numerous conferences, workshops, where those among the best Austro libertarians lecture several times a year. This list includes the senior faculty of the Mises Institute: http://www.mises.org/faculty.asp. For more information on the Mises Institute, contact: Pat@mises.org C2. University of Nevada at Las Vegas Comment from Prof. Peter Boettke of George Mason on this letter: “Unfortunately, opportunities for advanced study in Austrian economics are limited and good information for graduate students interested in Austrian economics is rare and should be made available to all possible parties. Professor Walter Block is doing an invaluable service in this regard. When I was a student I was fortunate because Bettina Bien Graves (FEE) and Walter Grinder (IHS) took a special interest in me and directed me to study at GMU, but these individuals have since retired and it is my opinion that many students interested in pursuing the advanced study of Austrian economics are falling between the cracks.”
Bruce Benson (President of the Association of Private Enterprise Educators – APEE) and Randy Holcombe have interests in Austrianism; James Gwartney, is a strong free enterpriser. Contacts: "Prof. James D. Gwartney" jdgwart@aol.com
George Selgin is highly knowledgeable about Austrian economics. Dwight Lee is a libertarian. I think there are two or three other libertarian non Austrian profs there. Contact: "Prof. Dwight R. Lee" DLEE@cbacc.cba.uga.edu; "selgin@terry.uga.edu" selgin@terry.uga.edu.
Glenn Fox is an Austro libertarian. There are phd programs available in Agricultural Economics, Economics, Environmental Economics and Rural Studies. He can supervise students in all of these programs. While he is the only Austrian at Guelph, his is a relatively free-market oriented department. However, Canada is even more socialistic than the U.S., hard as that is to believe. Contact: Glenn C. Fox Gfox@agec.uoguelph.ca
No, this is not a typographical error. I pass along the following statement, which came to me as a result of circulating an earlier version of this list:
“One thing about Chicago- most of the somewhat pro free market types are gone- the old limited government crowd of Friedman, Coase, Stigler and so on are long gone. Lucas and Becker are still around, but Becker is in poor health. Many of the newer Chicago guys are just run of the mill Neoclassicals.
“On the bright side, Harvard has improved immensely. Galbraith is gone. Robert Barro, Andrei Schleifer, Alberto Alesina, and Martin Feldstein are all at least as free market as Lucas or Becker (better than most economists, though not an Austro libertarian). Feldstien is the premier mainstream critic of Social Security. Schleifer likes Hayek. Greg Mankiw is also vastly different from the old Keynesians, though not as good as Barro or Feldstein. Harvard is arguably more free market than Chicago these days, not that either school is as good as GMU.”
In my own view, Chicago is better from a free enterprise point of view than in the opinion of this correspondent; I include his statement because I didn’t realize that Harvard was so good. At the University of Chicago law school alone there are Richard Epstein, Richard Posner and William Landes, all strong advocates of free enterprise; I say this despite the fact that I have had my disagreements with all three.
Offers a phd in agricultural economics. Peter Klein is a libertarian Austrian. There are also offered PhDs in economics, political science, history, finance, management, etc. Klein can be on the dissertation committees in any of those departments. Ag
Econ is his home department, so he can only chair dissertation committees in that subject.
Contact: Peter Klein pklein@missouri.edu
It has a phd program in economics. While it is not Austrian it is very free market. Steve Margolis is the department chair and many other faculty members are free market, supply-side, Chicago types such as David Ball, Lee Craig, Walter Wessels (Grove City undergrad), Ed Erickson and Mike Walden. Wally Thurman, a PERC fellow, free market environmentalist, has a joint appointment with the Ag and Resource econ dept, as does Tom Grennes with Econ & Ag Econ. Also, there are Austrians around. E.C. Pasour is emeritus but occasionally still teaches. Roy Cordato, an Austro-libertarian, teaches a course there, but only for upper level undergrads.
Murray Weidenbaum is a free market oriented professor, but teaches only undergraduate courses. Douglass North is a Nobel Laureate in Economics with a free market orientation, who thinks Hayek the most important economist of the 20th century. In addition, John Nye (an I.H.S. fellow) and Lee Benham are advocates of economic freedom. To the best of my knowledge, Wash U has more libertarian students than at any other school, virtually none of whom are econ majors. Wash U is also home of the Center for New Institutional Social Sciences, a program of interest to Austrians. Contact: Art Carden, carden@wueconc.wustl.edu who is a graduate student in economics.
There is no phd in economics. The agricultural school has a phd program in agricultural economics. There is a phd in applied economics, interdepartmental with agricultural economics and forestry, and integrated with the masters in economics. It is flexible so students can write dissertations with people from the economics department. You can also get a "resource" economics phd from the forestry department which is similarly flexible. Most students take most of their core courses in the economics department. Professors sympathetic to free enterprise include John Jackson in economics, David Laband (formerly of econ. department) now in forestry, Henry Thompson (formerly of econ. department) now in agriculture. Roger Garrison, an eminent Austrian macroeconomist and Sven Thomessen, an Austrian economist instructor, teach only undergraduate courses. Mark Thornton (an Austro libertarian) serves on a few dissertation committees. Further, Roderick Long, a professor of philosophy with a strong interest in the philosophy of Austrian economics, serves on economics dissertation committees. Contact: John Jackson, Economics Department Director of Graduate Studies; jacksjd@auburn.edu or Greg Traxler, Director of the Applied Economics PhD gtraxler@acesag.auburn.edu.
There is available a phd in Political Science and Sociology, but not Economics. Hans Hoppe, in my opinion the foremost Austro-libertarian now writing, can be a member of either of these dissertation committees. Contact: hoppeh@nevada.edu


Comments (19)
I think it is important to point out that if a student is interested in more than the consumption of a PhD (i.e., is also interested in becoming, say, employed as a University professor) that the programs listed are not at all equivalent ...
Published: February 3, 2004 12:52 PM
How mathematical is George Mason relative to NYU? In other words, what kind of undergraduate mathematical preparation is required (or recommended) for an econ PhD at GMU?
Published: February 3, 2004 11:59 PM
The mathematical barriers at GMU are definitely lower than they are at NYU. The math backgrounds of students at GMU vary greatly. I would say you have to be familiar with different elements of Calculus up through Calc III as well as some matrix algebra. To put things in perspective there is only one math course and one econometrics course required at GMU as compared to multiple courses in each at NYU. If you can make it through those two courses than you can make it through the rest of the program - from a technical perspective at least. Professor Bob Murphy at Hillsdale is a great source for information on the NYU program.
I also think Randy makes a valid point on the consumption versus investment good issue. Peter Boettke always advises potential grad students to go to the best school that will pay for you.
Published: February 4, 2004 7:22 AM
Hi:
That was great!
I cannot explain in economic terms but I find Austrian Economics the best economics out there. It makes a lot of sense to me.
Is there any other way to start studying/understanding about it apart from the excellent list that you have provided.
Another medium like Internet/Books ....
Thanks,
Suhit
Published: February 4, 2004 7:46 AM
I received my PhD from George Mason University in 1989, taught at NYU from 1990 to 1998 and now teach at GMU (1998-). Despite the fact that NYU has changed quite a bit in the last 6 years, those trends were in place when I was still there.
First, the program only admits less than 20 students per year at the moment --- and gets close to 1000 applications. You have to have an outstanding academic record prior to admission.
Second, NYU is a legitimate top 15 school, arguably top 10.
Third, the faculty follow a star system in pushing students --- they rank all the candidates collectively in the beginning of their last year and then decide who to push and where. This leads to a winner take all situation. The top student gets a job at Penn, Minn., Wisc. Madison, etc., the bottom students either don't get a job or lower level teaching jobs. These meetings were the most brutal meetings I have ever attended in terms of assessing others.
Fourth, while NYU is a great program, I also spent a year at Stanford (legitimately in the top 3 programs) and there is no comparison with the intellectual atmosphere. If you want to be a major academic go to the best school you can go to that will pay your full way and hope that means Harvard, Stanford, Chicago, MIT --- the next 5 are good, and the next 10 are ok, and then after that all programs are equally suspect in a certain sense.
Fifth, if 4 is correct then the key issue isn't whether I go to Clemson or Florida State or Georgia or Claremont McKenna or GMU. The key issue is whether I get into Harvard, MIT, Stanford or Chicago, and if I don't, then what niche market school best fits my needs that will pay the full way for me to go to school.
Sixth, and here is GMU's strength --- we are to put is simply the best weird place to study economics in the world. If your interest is in public choice, we are a leading center for that (with a Nobel Prize to prove it and one that should have been given that we are waiting for justice to Tullock -- but not with our breaths held). If you are interested in experimental economics, well we have that too (and a Nobel to prove it). If your interest is in Law and Economics, well our law school program is great (ranked in the top tier of American law schools) and our law and economics program according to one ranking had us in the top 5 programs. And we are now estabilishing a new program in religion and economics, and of course we have the Austrian program as well.
Seventh, the proof of the strength of the GMU program is scene in the placement of our students in good quality jobs. I define a good quality job as a tenure track appointment at a school that requires 3-3 teaching and less, average SATs around 1200, and pay at or above the national average for assistant professors in economics. Our best students consistently beat this standard and usually have multiple offers to consider for university professorships. I believe that outcompete many of our rivals in terms of student placement. There is a simple formula that must be followed to achieve this success:
PhD in hand (or close to it) + refereed publication(s) + good teaching evaluations + you are not a lunch tax == good job
Too often students fail to meet this formula and they cannot get a job and then they complain about the school they went to when in reality it is their inability to meet the standard by which the market judges you.
Bottom line --- got to the best school you can get into that will pay your full way. Getting into a top school where you pay your own way will not pan out (it is like being a walk on at a major college for sports -- sometimes it works, but it is rare. Absent that, think about law school rather than economics. If you still need to get a PhD in economics, got to the school that will pay you that you are more comfortable with and then once there work hard --- you can overachieve (e.g., John List is a great example of an overachiever in the field of experimental economics). Publish, publish, publish, when you teach be responsible and do a high quality job, and when you meet with people be decent and not a jerk. It is pretty much common sense and it works.
Published: February 4, 2004 8:39 AM
Thank you all for your suggestions. How receptive are main stream colleges in hiring faculty with an Austrain bent?
Published: February 4, 2004 10:22 PM
Can Anthony de Jasay be considered a good model as a private scholar? I'm sure there are others we can all look to who are making an impact without a 3-3 load (LR, obviously). Not to be anti-phd in any way.
But, is there a way to do a better job of educating, while reaching even more people, outside of academia?
Gary North's thoughts on academic daycare sound very interesting. In addition to phd's, we need entrepreneurs, school teachers, political reformers etc. who are familiar with Austrian economics.
Certainly, not everyone needs a phd in technical economics or a tenured position in a public school, in order to get kids excited about economics and aware of our political situation.
I'm just wondering about anyone's thoughts on the subject. Don't get me wrong though, I loved seeing this list. Thank you Prof. Block and everyone who is making this list possible every day.
The faculty list on the Mises site is quite impressive and growing stronger all the time.
Thank you again.
Published: February 4, 2004 11:28 PM
If a student isn't interested in teaching, but in working in the private sector, would your advice change?
How do those schools compare in placing students in jobs in the private sector?
Published: February 5, 2004 10:42 AM
Good questions --- and we should definitely get as many people as possible in as many walks of life as possible to be knowledgable and appreciative of the teachings of Austrian economics.
To answer questions specifically.
1. GMU places students in academics, think tanks,government agencies and private companies. Our track record is very strong in this regard. I personally have students who are working for think tanks, government, private sector firms and academics. We tend to focus more on academics only because in the scholarly race you tend to be myopic in terms of academic placement, academic publications, etc. But our PhD students do very well --- this department is well known in the area for producing serious thinkers with a good work ethic.
2. This last point about academics leads me to another point --- it is very rare for an independent scholar to have an _academic_ impact. That doesn't mean they don't have an intellectual impact. There are plent of examples where individuals are having a huge intellectual impact without university appointments. But to have an academic impact you tend to be in the academy (for good or bad). Academic impact doesn't mean intellectual impact or policy impact --- it simply means academic impact in the scholarly community. This is presumably a battle worth fighting and winning -- not the only one for sure. But we should not delude ourselves into thinking that we can win this battle while rejecting the academic route as a career.
3. Roger Garrison has the best advice I have ever heard on this --- potential graduate students make two errors --- error 1 --- "I cannot live my life without a PhD", and error 2 -- "My life will be happy once I get a PhD". Both are wrong. People can have very productive and fruitful intellectual lives without a PhD. And once you get a PhD all of life's problems really start! But what you cannot do without a PhD is get an appointement at a major university and influence the way that modern economic research is done. Most of us cannot do that even with a PhD. But in terms of communicating the basic teachings of economics and pushing for a free society --- for this there are many walks of life necessary to fight for the cause.
I think the key issue here is to remember that Henry Hazlitt was not a professor, he was a great communicator of economic ideas, and he did great service for our cause. However, he was also not an economic theorist and didn't pretend to be one. He acknowledged that Mises was a theorist and pathbreaker in scientific economics. And Mises acknowledged scholars such as Menger, Bohm-Bawerk, Weber, and students of his such as Machlup and Hayek as serious students of economic science.
In short, there is a division of labor and in order to pursue some of these roles there are requirements.
Good luck in find your niche and pursuing the educational path necessary to maximize your chances for success in that niche.
Published: February 5, 2004 11:06 AM
If your goal is to teach Austrian Economics to undergrads, there are low cost alternatives to getting a PhD in economics. It is possible to teach college with a Master's degree. You will never get on tenure track, but an MA, MS, or MBA can get you in front of a class. Many colleges hire part time adjuncts who only have one of these degrees. Some colleges will hire nontenured full time instructors who have a Masters. The hitch is that you must actually be able to teach very well to do this. You can get away with fair or even poor teaching skills with a PhD. As an adjunct or instructor you have to excel at teaching, because that is all you are hired to do, and there are a great many people with that level of education to compete against.
Also, some business programs will hire regular faculty to teach with an MBA and either relevant business experience or alternative credentials- a CPA or JD, instead of a PhD. Of course, you will not be teaching econ 101, but you can use your MBA to teach management classes from an Austrian perspective. Austrian insights into entrepreneurship and the market process are quite useful here. So, if you have an MBA and some real world experience, you can possibly get into teaching that way- without enduring 4 or 5 years of grad school. Several of my colleagues at Ramapo got into teaching this way.
Published: February 5, 2004 12:53 PM
For those who believe that taxation and inflation are robbery and theft, and anyone who receives tax-money is a beneficiary of robbery and theft, isn't accepting a job at an institution (University or otherwise) which is subsidized by the government self-contradictory?
Published: February 5, 2004 1:43 PM
I might add a few thoughts that not many on this list are probably aware of. There are many, many students who get their introduction to formal economics at 2-year community colleges. In my experience, these colleges are BADLY in need of people who understand economics. I have had contact with several of these full-time instructors over the past 13 years, and many of those teaching economics do not even have a masters degree in economics.
One good thing about the community college is that you CAN get tenure without a PhD. The downside of course is that you often teach five courses with five preparations.
It would be interesting to know how many student get their intro economic at community colleges. I don't know, but I'll guess that it is around 25%. In my view it is an area where the right person can have a lot of fun and make a difference at a different level.
Published: February 5, 2004 2:26 PM
The great thing about teaching, and learning, Austrian economics is that it sticks to people. The logic is so precise and clear that it becomes almost easy to learn and understand. It's not like "mainstream" micro- and macro-economics classes, which teach a bunch of incomprehensible mumbo-jumbo obscured by irrelevant and absurd equations supposing to "describe human action". Who is going to remember some obscure equations regarding labor surplus, or cardinal preference? However, once it's in someone's head that keeping wages artificially high increases unemployment, that is going to stick; likewise with ordinal preferences.
Published: February 5, 2004 5:40 PM
I'd like to see an all-out assault on a number of levels.
This economic and political nonsense has gone on long enough.
Maybe, we need more events to get people together to educate, coordinate, and determine the focus of individual specialization. I am in the process of beginning an austrian economics meet-up (hell, why not?).
Perhaps, we need to start a for-profit university. Or, a plan to develop Austrian programs in universities and colleges already in existence.
Or, we might find a way to buy a few television and radio stations. Or, at least get a few more paleo's and austrians on the airwaves.
I'd think an Austrian Economics world tour would go off rather well. We could get Dr. Raico and Dr. Powell to take the show on the road, something akin to The Producers perhaps.
I'd love any other ideas, comments, or ways to make it all happen...
Published: February 6, 2004 3:29 AM
Peter Boettke's advice above is sound and proven; if you want to become an academic, and want to influence the broader academic community, go to the best damn school that will pay you.
And "best" means, best in the eyes of a majority of the profession.
A Ph.D. from a top school opens doors that will remain closed to all but a select few who claw and scrape their way up to wider recognition.
That being said, I chose to attend the GMU Econ Ph.D. program, even though I could have gone to a "better" school, as GMU fit my work/life balance and long-run goals much better than other schools--and I have no regrets about that decision.
In evaluating the choice of what degree to pursue and where to study, just remember that Mises became a pathbreaker, but Hazlitt became wealthy.
Published: February 6, 2004 6:41 PM
As a adult student who is "lining up his ducks" to return to graduate school, I want to thank all of you very much for posting this information.
The lack of Austrian faculty in research and teaching also means there is a lack of Austrians as academic advisors, so good solid information like this cna be impossible to come by if folks like you didn't post it.
I see now that parts of my plans were unrealistic. I will talk to my wife and discuss our options for amending them.
Will there be anything akin to grad school/career advising available at the Austrian Scholars Conference?
~Bob
Published: February 9, 2004 9:22 AM
In addition to Bruce Benson and Randy Holcombe at FSU, therees are two other things worth noting:
1) The De Voe Moore Center, a research institution that focus on free enterprise related issues, which has a strong affiliation with the liberarian faculty and which sponsors many conferences and offers a certific in political economy: http://www.fsu.edu/%7Epolicy/
2) In the law school, Jonathan Klick, a Ph.D. in economics with a strong AEI/George Mason connection, does empirical work in law and economics: http://www.law.fsu.edu/faculty/profiles/profiles.php?Department=32&Employee=105
Published: February 13, 2005 8:18 AM
In addition to Bruce Benson and Randy Holcombe, there are two other things worth noting for the FSU entry:
1) The De Voe Moore Center, a research institution that focus on free enterprise related issues, which has a strong affiliation with the liberarian faculty and which sponsors many conferences and offers a certific in political economy: http://www.fsu.edu/%7Epolicy/
2) In the law school, Jonathan Klick, a Ph.D. in economics with a strong AEI/George Mason connection, does empirical work in law and economics: http://www.law.fsu.edu/faculty/profiles/profiles.php?Department=32&Employee=105
Published: February 13, 2005 8:19 AM
Walter Williams is convincing me not to go to George Mason University's Economics program.
This former department chairman held any economics professor *under suspicion* for not supporting his simplistic free market views. (See *A dynamite economics department* article.) Now he hates Jay Bennish for discussing US policies' international problems.
I argue with left and right teachers because I want to think.
Published: March 4, 2006 2:24 PM