One of the most striking facts about American history is how in a country born in old-style liberalism, the meaning of liberalism would not only change but be completely upended: liberalism now means its opposite.
In this massively important work of intellectual history, historian Arthur Ekirch explains that the change is bound up with attitudes towards militarism. It is an important event that this work, first published in 1967, is now in a new, modernized edition.
The foreword to this beautifuly written and passionate account is by Robert Higgs.
Liberalism once meant embrace of commerce and material progress, but this presumes an environment of peace and diplomacy as a means of resolving conflict. War, however, means the socialization of society productive structure. Once the American liberals of the late 19th century and early 20th century came to approve of war, they were face with a conflict: embrace state control in all areas or become advocates of peace. Business faced the same issue: oppose war and embrace free enterprise, or reconcile yourself to leviathan.
It was within the turmoil of this intellectual battle that the meaning of liberalism changed. Liberals embraced militarism and dragged liberalism down with it. That dramatic shift led to the invention of this creature called conservatism, the meaning of which also began to shift with the political winds.
This is no small semantic shift. It is a shift concerning how we see the role of government in society. We need to understand it in order to combat it and hold up genuine liberalism as a social ideal.
{ 6 comments }
This is a wonderful book. I bought the old edition in the late ’80. I knew about it from the literature list at the end of ‘Capitalism The Unknown Ideal’.
It’s good to see it in print again.
Liberalism: History and Future
Modern Liberalism at Wit’s End
I am totally awed by “Conceived in Liberty” by Murray Rothbard.
As a result I do not hunger for the another rendition of the history of American liberalism. Otherwise I probably would be very interested. I am sure it is a very good work!
I thought Spencer covered that well enough. As England went, so too did the US.
But, more ‘nice’ words at
http://toryanarchist.wordpress.com/2006/06/04/the-strange-death-of-liberal-america/
Sounds very interesting.
Neo, I also remember Rand putting in the bibliography of “Capitalism”.
Jeffrey: why do you say the change in the term liberal “led to the invention of this creature called conservatism”?
Didn’t conservatism exist before that?! For example, wouldn’t the Federalists and nationalists in the 1780′s be considered conservatives?
I am a libertarian. But I am sorry to say: Old-Style Libertarianism included acceptance of slavery. So much about that.
Comments on this entry are closed.