Pikers.

“To stem the longest recession . . .” well, that was a predicted long recession, right? We’ve had far worse in the past, in the ’70s, in 1982. It was a PREDICTED long recession.

And government actions are going to fulfill the prophecy, making it dwarf the Great Depression.

Of course, paying for it all will make the situation much worse: http://townhall.com/columnists/PaulJacob/2009/03/29/the_crisis_hits_in_waves

Yes, bling is good.

But this is the empiricists’ great glory to report such things! The spending, lending, or guaranteeing boosts the GDP which makes the whole thing possible ad infinitum – when you look at the numbers!, when you play the numbers game!, and when you see people as data!

Apart from the numbers who among the empiricists cares about counterfeiting, theft, and deceit? Squeeze that out your numbers! This is the empiricists’ version of neutrality!

History Book, year 2562:

In the year 2009 a country called United States of America stood at the edge of an abyss. And then they took a big step ahead…

You know, if you have to bail out that much, maybe, just maybe, the ship is sunk already….

These guys at the Fed and DC and Krugman et. al. all seem to be playing a “Never-ending” game of monopoly with a laser printer for a bank. It’s starting to not be fun anymore guys! Here, take my token and leave me out of the next round OK? Poker Anyone?

I just have two questions. I wonder what nation in history destroyed its currency the quickest and will the Obama Administration and the Fed beat that record?

With all of the money printing the Government and Fed are doing there is at least one occupation that will be in demand. A street sweeper to clean up all of that worthless paper just like the guy in this picture!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Inflaci%C3%B3_utan_1946.jpg

The Obama Administration and the Fed should aim big! I mean, since they are having so much fun printing all of that money and debasing the currency they might as well go all out. Think big! Sink the currency in world record time! I’m sure Krugman would be all to happy with his Keynesian ideals if Obama stated to the nation that they were going to inject 1Nongentillion (10 to the 2703 power) to stem the recession. Hey, at least Obama and the Fed would end up in the Guiness book of world records.

Buy gold.

How to Properly Invest your MONEY (a must see):

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/222624

I hear the IMF is changing its name to Inflationary Monetary Fund.

Eventually the number will be up on the numbers.

Trillion is the new million.

If Bernanke drove his car like he creates money he’d only be allowed to drive on the Autobahn.

When is he going to be fired?

“The president and Treasury Secretary Geithner have said they will do what it takes,” Goldman Sachs Group Inc. Chief Executive Officer Lloyd Blankfein said after the meeting. “If it is enough, that will be great. If it is not enough, they will have to do more.”

“Everything the Fed, the FDIC and the Treasury do doesn’t always work out right but back in October we came within an eyelash of having a truly horrible collapse of our financial system, said Johnson, a former Fed senior economist. “They used their creativity to help the worst-case scenario from unfolding and I’m awfully glad they did it.”

Would a full year’s GDP be worse than a “truly horrible collapse of our financial system”? $42,000 in obligations for me, my wife, and my son, and every other citizen of the US? (So far…)

Really, what IS the cost-benefit analysis of this situation?

Why does $12Bn of this go to a German bank with over $2Tn in assets? Were they going to fail? Why should ANY money go to a German bank that took a risk and lost?

Gary Kah’s book, Enrout to Global Occupation details what has been decided behind closed doors by the powers that be (which excludes you and me) for decades. He shows, with documentation, how through either global warming, or an economic collapse the New World Order will be ushered in. I strongly suggest you get it and read it. We must reject this evil if we want to remain free.

\

709. BANKS, Fictitious Capital. – The banks themselves were doing business on capitals, three-fourths of which were fictitious; and to extend their profit they furnished fictitious capital to every man, who having nothing and disliking the labors of the plow, chose rather to call himself a merchant, to set up a house of $5,000 a year expense, to dash into every species of mercantile gambling, and if that ended as gambling generally does, a fraudulent bankruptcy was an ultimate resource of retirement and competence. This fictitious capital, probably of one hundred millions of dollars, is now to be lost, and to fall on somebody; it must take on those who have property to meet it, and probably on the less cautious part, who, not aware of the impending catastrophe have suffered themselves to contract, or to be in debt, and must now sacrifice their property of a value many times the amount of their debt. We have been truly sowing the wind, and are now reaping the whirlwind. If the present crisis should end in the annihilation of these pennyless and ephemeral interlopers only, and reduce our commerce to the measure of our own wants and surplus productions, it will be a benefit in the end. But how to effect this, and give time to real capital, and the holders of real property, to back out of their entanglements by degrees requires more knowledge of political economy than we posses. I believe it might be done, but I despair of its being done. The eyes of our citizens are not sufficiently open to the true cause of our distress. They ascribe them to everything but their true cause, the banking system; a system, which, if it could do good in any form, is yet so certain of leading to abuse, as to be utterly incompatible with the public safety and prosperity. At present, all is confusion, uncertainty and panic. – TO RICHARD RUSH. FORD ED., X. 133. (M., June 1819.)