…according to a new ad campaign. Maybe libertarians should start saying, “Oppose the government! It sponsors terrorism!” It does, after all.
Source link: http://blog.mises.org/6416/wal-mart-like-drug-dealers-supports-terrorism/
Wal-Mart, Like Drug Dealers, Supports Terrorism
Previous post: New Working Paper
Next post: New Stock of Rare Books
{ 8 comments }
This is all Walmarts fault. If you give an inch the unions and progressives will attempt to take a mile.
If Walmart was worried about putting customers in stores like its founder they would not have these stupid problems. But they made a stupid choice and decided to work with the statist scum. Now they pay.
You wonder why union membership is declining.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t Wal-mart be hardest hit by a port nuclear attack? Since that would kill their supply chains and cause their stores to be looted?
I mean, other than the dead people and all.
I’m just saying, if you’re claiming they’re skimping on port nuclear safety to … *increase* profits … you kinda have to wonder.
I agree with Person — you really have to lack the ability to start with the assumption that mega-successful Wal-Mart doesn’t care about the safety of ports. It is like saying they don’t care about the safety of their trucking (which I believe is said by truckers who don’t like Wal-Mart’s demanding schedules for loading and stocking stores).
Furthermore, Wal-Mart has a lot of incentive to productively prevent terrorism, too… so the whole ad is silly rhetoric. But Bill is right, too, in saying that Wal-Mart’s CEO has been flirting with the political scum… once you play in the dirt, you no longer have clean hands.
lack the ability *to think*
WQQW
Illiegal Immigrants Require 6 Arrests to Warrant Federal Prosecution in Texas, Memo Says CC
What is the difference between a union and a business? They both provide a good/service and they each act to achieve goals.
That union membership is falling could be to do with the changing nature of work rather than any inherent mistrust of unions; or that governments have changed the rules / state of play in favour of one group at the expense of another.
Compulsory unionism though is another matter and I don’t think it is right for people to be forced into membership. Alternatively businesses getting favours from governments is a pet peeve of mine as well.
no workable solution from me then :0)
cheers
thanks good site and webmaster
Comments on this entry are closed.