Of course there’s still some problems with this analysis, but it’s a pretty good start.
With regard to one of my earlier posts, maybe this calls for some optimism that they will eventually figure out who really owns the Fed.
Of course there’s still some problems with this analysis, but it’s a pretty good start.
With regard to one of my earlier posts, maybe this calls for some optimism that they will eventually figure out who really owns the Fed.
Previous post: Nightmare or Dream?
Next post: The Demise of Small Government
{ 3 comments }
The MSNBC article brings up a point that I’ve been thinking about lately. If GDP just measures economic activity as opposed to actual real growth in value then why should we care about it? It’s probably safe to say that when government states the economy “grew” 5% in a given year it’s a worthless, if not misleading number. Maybe I should steal my neighbor’s wallet, take the money, buy a broom at Home Depot, and sweep the town hall parking lot 40 hours a week. This should increase GDP. Government officials should be all for it, plus I’ll be guaranteed a “living wage”. Hey, I would be working 40 hours a week, so I deserve it, right? I’m sure they wouldn’t say my sweeping service is valued at less than a “living wage”. They wouldn’t make such a subjective value judgement, would they?
Government spending is considered “production” for purposes of calculating GDP. NNP is a more realistic, but less common, measurement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_National_Product
Was the Marshall plan a good idea for the American economy?
Comments on this entry are closed.