Just as you thought the SocSec “privatization” couldn’t get any worse, The Washington Post reports more grim truths: they won’t be private, they won’t be managed by individuals, and you won’t withdraw these funds at retirement. (Pointer from FEE). As for Bush’s promise of no tax increases, that depends on what the meaning of tax is….
Source link: http://blog.mises.org/3088/its-not-private-its-a-loan/
It’s not private; it’s a loan
Previous post: Vouchers: Another Income Redistribution Scheme



{ 3 comments }
How can a non-voluntary system be called “privatized” if the private person sponsoring it has no say in the matter?
Welcome to 1984, 21 years late!
Washington Post has since corrected the article to clarify that it will be not like a loan… See http://uppereastsider.blogspot.com/2005/02/distortions.html
Comments on this entry are closed.