[I'm leaving up this item in the hope of helping others.The solution to the problem below is to remove compression in the printer settings, and that means changing the defaults, whether you use standard or high quality or whatever, a solution that seems obvious in retrospect but which vexed me for six months.]
I’m hardly the first to observe that software development seems to have slowed to a crawl (hardly a surprise given the government-created patent thicket) and that “upgrades” can no longer be relied upon to constitute an actual improvement.
Here is a sample of what I mean. Using an existing PDF file and printing to another PDF file, at the highest possible resolution, with all the right settings, you end up with disaster using Adobe Acrobat 9 Professional. This was inflated by 1600% but you can see the absurdity. The workaround is to use a product from a smaller and more innovate and more customer-hungry company.
{ 16 comments }
Example of closed source failing. Any technology that attempts to make a monopoly of itself ultimately will lack in quality and be overpriced. Need another example? Microsoft Vista.
I bet that little tool you used is vastly cheaper.
Personally, I try to never use Acrobat because there are faster, lightweight and sometimes free PDF software available.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PDF_software
Some are open, some aren’t and quality varies but most of them, in my opinion, operate better.
I would like to make two specific comments.
1) The problem you are seeing has NOTHING TO DO with resolution. The “artifacting” that you are seeing in the new PDF is due to the use of the JPEG algorithm for compression. See http://www.scantips.com/basics9jb.html for more information. The choice of JPEG was YOURS, in whatever settings you choose when you “printed a PDF to PDF”
2) The process of converting from one PDF to another via the printing process is called “refrying” and is NOT recommend by Adobe or anyone else. I have an old blog entry about it at http://www.acrobatusers.com/blogs/leonardr/why-refrying-pdf-evil or here is another person’s at http://www.prepressure.com/pdf/basics/refrying.
If you need to process a PDF to apply certain corrections/optimizations to it, there are various tools on the market (from open source to commercial) that can do everything you can via “refrying” (and more!) without all the hassles.
Leonard Rosenthol
PDF Standards Architect
Adobe Systems
Leonard is right. The problem is that JPG compression is the default, which must be new in this edition. You can change the settings in the printer driver and select. I tried it without and it works just fine.
My apologies. I’ll leave up this item and edit it a bit.
I admit to not knowing a lot about the prevailing technological options. All I can say is that I’ve been using PDF Creator to create the .pdfs for my personal website. I just type up what I need into Microsoft Word and PDF Creator converts it to .pdf for me.
I’ve often wondered what you guys at the LvMI do, and if it’s all that much more advanced than what I’m doing.
In any event, if I set my Microsoft Word page at 6″ x 9″ (the standard LvMI book size) and try to concert it into .pdf with the aforementioned programme, the .pdf comes out looking all wrong. But when I set my Microsoft Word page at one of the various standard settings (letter, legal, &c.), the .pdf comes out correctly. I really can’t say why this is.
Yours,
Alex Peak
Jeffery, I think you should learn about raster vs. vector graphics. That will help your understanding of what is going in your example.
http://www.nw-media.com/photography-articles/31/raster-vs-vector/
Here is a good overview.
I agree with your opinion that Acrobat 9 is poor quality, but for different reasons. My issues are feature and memory bloat, the update checker and sluggish performance.
I think I do know about raster/vector but this was an image scan.
So long as we are complaining about Adobe, I’ll add this: its bookmark nesting function is way too fussy as compared with previous versions. It takes twice as long to get it right.
Actually I think this is a good example where the producer makes a silly assumption guessing at what the consumer wants. Why is the default set to jpg?
it’s a good example of how unnecessarily overcomplicated this software has become. A small business accountant who wants to move paperless shouldn’t have to learn about raster vs. vector graphics. This is ridiculous. This is just yet another reason why adobe is ridiculous as a software suite. I could go on for hours including their ridiculous updating process and bloated memory image size.
The very fact that I have to waste 10 minutes of my life looking up on google for blogs on how to print correctly with Adobe 9 is a testament of how ridiculous the software is. Save yourself the time and get something else.
I don’t think Vista is that bad an operating system; but I guess the opinion comes from letting Apple do the marketing.
Personally, I’d rather have a Microsoft OS (or a Linux if available) than an Apple PC made of crappy proprietary parts than cannot be customized – and you better hope your Apple doesn’t have one part fail because it’ll bring down the whole thing AND you’ll have to go to them to repair it.
djvu is better than PDF for scanned content anyway; you should look into that.
Is it just me who finds it accommodating that a PDF Standards Architect from Adobe Systems addressed the issue quick smart? Service anyone? Haha
I’m no lover of Acrobat, either. Features in their older versions that were very useful have either disappeared or been buried so deep in the interface that you can’t find them. For example, copying a table from a pdf and pasting it into a spreadsheet. Used to work. Now all you get is a jumble of tab separated figures. Thanks for that feature.
I’m sure there’s probably some way to do what the old version did, but what was wrong with the old way of doing it (i.e., paste)?
Computer software interfaces are full of designs that are counter intuitive and un-ergonomic. Like putting the “close window” button right next to the “minimize” and “maximize” window buttons. Or putting the “Send” message button right next to the “To” and “Cc” and “Bcc” buttons. Very stupid designs, especially when you consider you’re pointing with your fist.
Jeff,
Please put a big bold Update:. I skipped the first paragraph because I wanted to get to the meat.
We stopped using Adobe Acrobat because I noticed some odd happenings when I was using the program online. Turns out Acrobat is known for its exploits (holes).
http://www.google.com/search?q=Adobe+acrobat+exploits&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
I agree, updates make little difference. The program we use now is faster, safer and easier to use.
The Poland inhabitant football crew (Brightness: Reprezentacja Polski w pilce noznej) represents Poland in syndicate football and is controlled sooner than the Swot up on Football Cooperative, the governing hull representing football in Poland.
Poland’s home territory is Silesian Amphitheatre in Chorzow and their head crammer is Franciszek Smuda. You can vigil soccer lively on meczyki Mecze na zywo) The most well-renowned Murder span was the story of the mid-seventies that held England to a gather at Wembley to be eligible into the World Cup in 1974. They finished third 1-0 to Brazil in the competition with striker Grzegorz Lato prepossessing the Special Boot for his seven goals. Poland had another third place occur in 1982 beating France 3–2 in the third-place play-off. Mind livescores on Wyniki na zywo Poland also won the gold medal in the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, and the melodious medal in 1976 in Montreal as doubtlessly in 1992 silver medal in Barcelona. Do you like a snappish sketch from soccer? Wtahc on Skroty meczow Their Olympic success was helped alongside a wholly amateur platoon, almost identical to other nations behind the Iron Curtain.
Would also shun Jason Light of day too. As notable of a days he has had without euphonious a head, he looked entirely sub genre at the President Cup. Troupe Intercontinental would have been looking to him as a impress upon based trouper in Melbourne to zakłady bukmacherskie handle c improperly the party, but he exceptionally didnt advice up. Pair Captain Greg Norman rode him hard-hearted and Girl unaffectedly looked a morsel beaten up and exasperated by at the destination of it. That out of whack maintain been a socking transference mele to bounce assist from, so we are not common to look at him in too much sagacity this week. Talented and incredibly inspirited, but looks as if he needs a rest. Gentleman Aussie Robert Allenby (who is a one-time combatant of the incident) is not expected to frame much bumping either because he isnt in imitate and so we hide up to chop off the options down in stand for of Australian PGA Championship golf betting. Would look at Aussie John Senden though, who would orchestrate been a pleasure pick looking seeking Tandem touch up International. Senden was dispatch-bearer up at the Australian Unbolted until to the Presidents Cup, and looks a smashing right for Coolum. He likes it there at the order and is in common-or-garden variety quantities incarnate in words to begin be means of the hustle of fore-part continual Aussies and board the realm here. Not riding as largish in Australian PGA Championship golf betting as some of his compatriots, but a a mountain surpass value than most of them.
There is a impound challenge as well proper to confirm in from Bubba Watson and Rickie Fowler, who should eternally be entertaining on zakłady sportowe. On people’s impress upon besmirch despite the fact that, as good enough as these could potentially do, along with the likes of YE Yang and Anthony Kim, would bear up under at near with an Australian connection. Who, in of the bunch?
Comments on this entry are closed.